CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Cell Biol Educ 1(4): 154-172 2002
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.02-07-0024
© 2002 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DebBurman, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DebBurman, S. K.

ARTICLES

Learning How Scientists Work: Experiential Research Projects to Promote Cell Biology Learning and Scientific Process Skills

Shubhik K. DebBurman

Department of Biology, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045

Corresponding author. E-mail address: debburman{at}lfc.edu.

Facilitating not only the mastery of sophisticated subject matter, but also the development of process skills is an ongoing challenge in teaching any introductory undergraduate course. To accomplish this goal in a sophomore-level introductory cell biology course, I require students to work in groups and complete several mock experiential research projects that imitate the professional activities of the scientific community. I designed these projects as a way to promote process skill development within content-rich pedagogy and to connect text-based and laboratory-based learning with the world of contemporary research. First, students become familiar with one primary article from a leading peer-reviewed journal, which they discuss by means of PowerPoint-based journal clubs and journalism reports highlighting public relevance. Second, relying mostly on primary articles, they investigate the molecular basis of a disease, compose reviews for an in-house journal, and present seminars in a public symposium. Last, students author primary articles detailing investigative experiments conducted in the lab. This curriculum has been successful in both quarter-based and semester-based institutions. Student attitudes toward their learning were assessed quantitatively with course surveys. Students consistently reported that these projects significantly lowered barriers to primary literature, improved research-associated skills, strengthened traditional pedagogy, and helped accomplish course objectives. Such approaches are widely suited for instructors seeking to integrate process with content in their courses.

Key Words: undergraduate • science education • experiential learning • mock symposia • primary literature comprehension • project based • assessment • survey







HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.