HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit Reader Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Reader Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Sign up for eTOCs Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klymkowsky, M. W. Articles by Zeilik, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klymkowsky, M. W. Articles by Zeilik, M.

Bioliteracy and Teaching Efficacy: What Biologists Can Learn from Physicists

Michael W. Klymkowsky^*,, Kathy Garvin-Doxas, and Michael Zeilik

^* Department of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology and Alliance for Learning, Technology & Society, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0347; and Institute for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-1156

Corresponding author. E-mail address: Michael.Klymkowsky{at}colorado.edu.

The introduction of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) by David Hestenes and colleagues in 1992 produced a remarkable impact within the community of physics teachers. An instrument to measure student comprehension of the Newtonian concept of force, the FCI demonstrates that active learning leads to far superior student conceptual learning than didactic lectures. Compared to a working knowledge of physics, biological literacy and illiteracy have an even more direct, dramatic, and personal impact. They shape public research and reproductive health policies, the acceptance or rejection of technological advances, such as vaccinations, genetically modified foods and gene therapies, and, on the personal front, the reasoned evaluation of product claims and lifestyle choices. While many students take biology courses at both the secondary and the college levels, there is little in the way of reliable and valid assessment of the effectiveness of biological education. This lack has important consequences in terms of general bioliteracy and, in turn, for our society. Here we describe the beginning of a community effort to define what a bioliterate person needs to know and to develop, validate, and disseminate a tiered series of instruments collectively known as the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI), which accurately measures student comprehension of concepts in introductory, genetic, molecular, cell, and developmental biology. The BCI should serve as a lever for moving our current educational system in a direction that delivers a deeper conceptual understanding of the fundamental ideas upon which biology and biomedical sciences are based.

Key Words: science literacy • basic and advanced biological concepts • learning assessment and evaluation • misconceptions • course transformation