CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Cell Biol Educ 3(2): 111-121 2004
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0014
© 2004 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khodor, J.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khodor, J.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G. C.

ESSAY

A Hierarchical Biology Concept Framework: A Tool for Course Design

Julia Khodor*,{dagger}, Dina Gould Halme*,{dagger}, and Graham C. Walker*,{ddagger}

* Department of Biology, 68-633, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139

{ddagger} Corresponding author. E-mail address: gwalker{at}mit.edu.

A typical undergraduate biology curriculum covers a very large number of concepts and details. We describe the development of a Biology Concept Framework (BCF) as a possible way to organize this material to enhance teaching and learning. Our BCF is hierarchical, places details in context, nests related concepts, and articulates concepts that are inherently obvious to experts but often difficult for novices to grasp. Our BCF is also cross-referenced, highlighting interconnections between concepts. We have found our BCF to be a versatile tool for design, evaluation, and revision of course goals and materials. There has been a call for creating Biology Concept Inventories, multiple-choice exams that test important biology concepts, analogous to those in physics, astronomy, and chemistry. We argue that the community of researchers and educators must first reach consensus about not only what concepts are important to test, but also how the concepts should be organized and how that organization might influence teaching and learning. We think that our BCF can serve as a catalyst for community-wide discussion on organizing the vast number of concepts in biology, as a model for others to formulate their own BCFs and as a contribution toward the creation of a comprehensive BCF.

Key Words: undergraduate • Biology Concept Framework • hierarchical • Biology Concept Inventory • misconceptions • course design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
D. G. Halme, J. Khodor, R. Mitchell, and G. C. Walker
A Small-Scale Concept-based Laboratory Component: The Best of Both Worlds
CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 41 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.