CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Cell Biol Educ 4(4): 298-310 2005
DOI: 10.1187/05-06-0082
© 2005 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, W. B.

ARTICLES

Teaching More by Lecturing Less

Jennifer K. Knight, and William B. Wood

Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

Address correspondence to: Jennifer K. Knight (knight{at}colorado.edu).

We carried out an experiment to determine whether student learning gains in a large, traditionally taught, upper-division lecture course in developmental biology could be increased by partially changing to a more interactive classroom format. In two successive semesters, we presented the same course syllabus using different teaching styles: in fall 2003, the traditional lecture format; and in spring 2004, decreased lecturing and addition of student participation and cooperative problem solving during class time, including frequent in-class assessment of understanding. We used performance on pretests and posttests, and on homework problems to estimate and compare student learning gains between the two semesters. Our results indicated significantly higher learning gains and better conceptual understanding in the more interactive course. To assess reproducibility of these effects, we repeated the interactive course in spring 2005 with similar results. Our findings parallel results of similar teaching-style comparisons made in other disciplines. On the basis of this evidence, we propose a general model for teaching large biology courses that incorporates interactive engagement and cooperative work in place of some lecturing, while retaining course content by demanding greater student responsibility for learning outside of class.

Key Words: undergraduate students • developmental biology • peer instruction • just-in-time teaching • concept maps




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
J. G. Foy, M. Feldman, E. Lin, M. Mahoney, and C. Sjoblom
Neuroscience Workshops for Fifth-Grade School Children by Undergraduate Students: A University-School Partnership
CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2006; 5(2): 128 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.