HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit Reader Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Reader Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Casem, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Casem, M. L.

Student Perspectives on Curricular Change: Lessons from an Undergraduate Lower-Division Biology Core

Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834-9480

Address correspondence to: Merri Lynn Casem (mcasem{at}fullerton.edu).

Inquiry-based laboratories are acknowledged as the preferred method of instruction for development of research skills. Much has been written about changes in student performance associated with inquiry, but less is known about how students view the inquiry-based format or whether they perceive a benefit from this type of instruction. The Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) survey was used to evaluate and compare student reactions to the new, inquiry-based laboratories of a lower-division undergraduate curriculum, from implementation to the present (an interval of 3 yr). Initial student response to the format and value of the inquiry labs improved over time. The quality of the graduate teaching assistants and the clarity of the laboratory manual were important variables influencing student perception. A student's perception of his/her retention of lab-related skills was strongly associated with perceptions of gains in those skills. Student responses reflect their most current laboratory experience and not a cumulative effect of participation in the core series of courses. Student success in the inquiry format was not associated with gender or status as a transfer student. The majority of students believe that their experiences in the lower-division inquiry labs have prepared them for upper-division course work.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Kelley, R. J. Davidson, and D. L. Nelson An Imaging Roadmap for Biology Education: From Nanoparticles to Whole Organisms CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 202 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Spiro and K. I. Knisely Alternation of Generations and Experimental Design: A Guided-Inquiry Lab Exploring the Nature of the her1 Developmental Mutant of Ceratopteris richardii (C-Fern) CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]