HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material Submit Reader Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Reader Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lynd-Balta, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lynd-Balta, E.

Using Literature and Innovative Assessments to Ignite Interest and Cultivate Critical Thinking Skills in an Undergraduate Neuroscience Course

Department of Biology, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY 14618

Monitoring Editor: Deborah Allen

Address correspondence to: Eileen Lynd-Balta (elynd-balta{at}sjfc.edu)

Science education reform initiatives emphasize 1) the value of concepts over facts; 2) the benefits of open-ended, inquiry-based problem-solving rather than protocols leading to a single correct answer; and 3) the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to teaching that is not confined by departmental boundaries. Neuroscientists should be at the forefront of this movement by the very nature of the discipline we study. Neuroscience is a relatively new field that integrates diverse subjects (anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, molecular biology, computer science, and psychology) and experimental advances are constantly changing and expanding our understanding of brain function. How can we convey this excitement in the classroom? The project described in this article uses nonscientific literature to introduce a scientific topic of study. In addition, the multitask assignment requires the acquisition of content knowledge and the development of critical thinking skills. As students explore the topic from multiple perspectives, they recognize the interconnectedness of science and society and confront ethical and moral issues related to science. A comparison of exam scores, essay responses, engagement level, as well as students' own reflections, demonstrates that inclusion of the project does not sacrifice content knowledge, rather it enhances the overall learning process.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. D. Hurd A Microcosm of the Biomedical Research Experience for Upper-level Undergraduates CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 210 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Yuan and Y. Lin Globalizing the Science Curriculum: An Undergraduate Course on Traditional Chinese Medicine as a Complementary Approach to Western Medicine CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 220 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ramos Goyette and J. DeLuca A Semester-long Student-directed Research Project Involving Enzyme Immunoassay: Appropriate for Immunology, Endocrinology, or Neuroscience Courses CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 332 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Allen and K. Tanner Rubrics: Tools for Making Learning Goals and Evaluation Criteria Explicit for Both Teachers and Learners CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 197 - 203. [Full Text] [PDF]