CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 5(3): 247-254 2006
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.05-11-0124
© 2006 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuldell, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuldell, N. H.

Articles

How Golden is Silence? Teaching Undergraduates the Power and Limits of RNA Interference

Natalie H. Kuldell

Biological Engineering Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Monitoring Editor: Marshall Sundberg

Address correspondence to: Natalie H. Kuldell (nkuldell{at}mit.edu)

It is hard and getting harder to strike a satisfying balance in teaching. Time dedicated to student-generated models or ideas is often sacrificed in an effort to "get through the syllabus." I describe a series of RNA interference (RNAi) experiments for undergraduate students that simultaneously explores fundamental concepts in gene regulation, develops cutting-edge laboratory skills, and embraces student-directed learning. Students design a small interfering RNA (siRNA) against luciferase, add it to cells expressing this gene, and then quantitatively assess the siRNA's effect on both intended and unintended targets, using a luciferase assay and a DNA microarray. Because both RNAi and microarray technologies are relatively new, with no clear consensus on their analysis or limitations, students are encouraged to explore different approaches to the design of their reagents and interpretations of their data. The ability to creatively formulate a hypothesis-driven experimental approach to a scientific question and to critically evaluate collected data is stressed. Equally important, this experiment emphasizes how modern scientific ideas emerge, are debated, tested, and decided.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
A. M. Campbell, M. L. S. Ledbetter, L. L.M. Hoopes, T. T. Eckdahl, L. J. Heyer, A. Rosenwald, E. Fowlks, S. Tonidandel, B. Bucholtz, and G. Gottfried
Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: Meeting the Goals of BIO2010
CBE Life Sci Educ, June 1, 2007; 6(2): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.