CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 6(1): 29-41 2007
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190
© 2007 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preszler, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shuster, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preszler, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shuster, M.

Articles

Assessment of the Effects of Student Response Systems on Student Learning and Attitudes over a Broad Range of Biology Courses

Ralph W. Preszler, Angus Dawe, Charles B. Shuster, and Michèle Shuster

Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001

Monitoring Editor: Marshall Sundberg

Address correspondence to: Ralph W. Preszler (rpreszle{at}nmsu.edu)

With the advent of wireless technology, new tools are available that are intended to enhance students' learning and attitudes. To assess the effectiveness of wireless student response systems in the biology curriculum at New Mexico State University, a combined study of student attitudes and performance was undertaken. A survey of students in six biology courses showed that strong majorities of students had favorable overall impressions of the use of student response systems and also thought that the technology improved their interest in the course, attendance, and understanding of course content. Students in lower-division courses had more strongly positive overall impressions than did students in upper-division courses. To assess the effects of the response systems on student learning, the number of in-class questions was varied within each course throughout the semester. Students' performance was compared on exam questions derived from lectures with low, medium, or high numbers of in-class questions. Increased use of the response systems in lecture had a positive influence on students' performance on exam questions across all six biology courses. Students not only have favorable opinions about the use of student response systems, increased use of these systems increases student learning.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
R. W. Preszler
Replacing Lecture with Peer-led Workshops Improves Student Learning
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 182 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss
Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 203 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
K. Crossgrove and K. L. Curran
Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material
CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 146 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.