CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 6(2): 119-131 2007
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-06-0169
© 2007 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGee, R.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGee, R.
Right arrow Articles by DeLong, M. J.

Articles

Collaborative Co-Mentored Dissertations Spanning Institutions: Influences on Student Development

Richard McGee*, and Mary J. DeLong{dagger}

Graduate Partnerships Program, Office of Intramural Training and Education, Office of Intramural Research, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0234

Monitoring Editor: Robin Wright

Address correspondence to: Richard McGee (r-mcgee{at}northwestern.edu)

The Graduate Partnerships Program (GPP), established in 2000, links universities with National Institutes of Health (NIH) laboratories for predoctoral training. Several partnerships required that students create collaborative dissertations between at least one NIH and one university research mentor. More than 60 students have entered into these co-mentored research collaborations, and many others established them even though not required. Much was learned about the experiences of these and other GPP students by using structured interviews as part of a formal self-study of the GPP in 2005. Complications of trying to work with two mentors are managed through careful program design and mentor selection. In the collaborative model, students develop a complex set of scientific and interpersonal skills. They lead their own independent research projects, drawing on the expertise of multiple mentors and acquiring skills at negotiating everyone's interests. They develop high levels of independence, maturity, flexibility, and the ability to see research questions from different perspectives. No evidence was found that co-mentoring diminishes the normally expected accomplishments of a student during the Ph.D. Multi-mentored dissertations require skills not all graduate students may possess this early in training, but for those who do, they can promote rapid and extensive development of skills needed for collaborative, interdisciplinary research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
J. S. Kahn and R. M. Greenblatt
Mentoring Early-Career Scientists for HIV Research Careers
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 99(S1): S37 - S42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
R. McGee and J. L. Keller
Identifying Future Scientists: Predicting Persistence into Research Training
CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 316 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.