| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Articles |
Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Monitoring Editor: Martha Grossel
Address correspondence to: Scott Freeman (srf991{at}u.washington.edu)
We tested five course designs that varied in the structure of daily and weekly active-learning exercises in an attempt to lower the traditionally high failure rate in a gateway course for biology majors. Students were given daily multiple-choice questions and answered with electronic response devices (clickers) or cards. Card responses were ungraded; clicker responses were graded for right/wrong answers or participation. Weekly practice exams were done as an individual or as part of a study group. Compared with previous versions of the same course taught by the same instructor, students in the new course designs performed better: There were significantly lower failure rates, higher total exam points, and higher scores on an identical midterm. Attendance was higher in the clicker versus cards section; attendance and course grade were positively correlated. Students did better on clicker questions if they were graded for right/wrong answers versus participation, although this improvement did not translate into increased scores on exams. In this course, achievement increases when students get regular practice via prescribed (graded) active-learning exercises.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. L. DeHaan Teaching Creativity and Inventive Problem Solving in Science CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 172 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 203 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-R. Dahmani, P. Schneeberger, and I. M. Kramer Analysis of Students' Aptitude to Provide Meaning to Images that Represent Cellular Components at the Molecular Level CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 226 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Pfund, S. Miller, K. Brenner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, D. Ebert-May, A. P. Fagen, J. Gentile, S. Gossens, I. M. Khan, et al. Summer Institute to Improve University Science Teaching Science, April 24, 2009; 324(5926): 470 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Walker, S. H. Cotner, P. M. Baepler, and M. D. Decker A Delicate Balance: Integrating Active Learning into a Large Lecture Course CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2008; 7(4): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Smith, W. B. Wood, and J. K. Knight The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2008; 7(4): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Wood Sharing in the Classroom CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2008; 7(3): 263 - 264. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Crossgrove and K. L. Curran Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 146 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
