HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material Submit Reader Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Reader Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Sign up for eTOCs Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McGee, R. Articles by Keller, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGee, R. Articles by Keller, J. L.

Identifying Future Scientists: Predicting Persistence into Research Training

Richard McGee^*,, and Jill L. Keller

*Mayo Graduate School and Office of Minority Student Affairs, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905; and Office of Student Affairs, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724-5120

Monitoring Editor: Elizabeth Armstrong

Address correspondence to: Richard McGee (r-mcgee{at}northwestern.edu) or Jill L. Keller (jlkeller{at}u.arizona.edu)

This study used semistructured interviews and grounded theory to look for characteristics among college undergraduates that predicted persistence into Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training. Participants in the summer undergraduate and postbaccalaureate research programs at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine were interviewed at the start, near the end, and 8–12 months after their research experience. Of more than 200 themes considered, five characteristics predicted those students who went on to Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training or to M.D. training intending to do research: 1) Curiosity to discover the unknown, 2) Enjoyment of problem solving, 3) A high level of independence, 4) The desire to help others indirectly through research, and 5) A flexible, minimally structured approach to the future. Web-based surveys with different students confirmed the high frequency of curiosity and/or problem solving as the primary reason students planned research careers. No evidence was found for differences among men, women, and minority and nonminority students. Although these results seem logical compared with successful scientists, their constancy, predictive capabilities, and sharp contrast to students who chose clinical medicine were striking. These results provide important insights into selection and motivation of potential biomedical scientists and the early experiences that will motivate them toward research careers.