CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 7(1): 146-154 2008
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0060
© 2008 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crossgrove, K.
Right arrow Articles by Curran, K. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crossgrove, K.
Right arrow Articles by Curran, K. L.

Other Articles

Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material

Kirsten Crossgrove, and Kristen L. Curran

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, WI 53190

Monitoring Editor: Martha Grossel

Address correspondence to: Kristen L. Curran (currank{at}uww.edu)

Student response systems (clickers) are viewed positively by students and instructors in numerous studies. Evidence that clickers enhance student learning is more variable. After becoming comfortable with the technology during fall 2005–spring 2006, we compared student opinion and student achievement in two different courses taught with clickers in fall 2006. One course was an introductory biology class for nonmajors, and the other course was a 200 level genetics class for biology majors. Students in both courses had positive opinions of the clickers, although we observed some interesting differences between the two groups of students. Student performance was significantly higher on exam questions covering material taught with clickers, although the differences were more dramatic for the nonmajors biology course than the genetics course. We also compared retention of information 4 mo after the course ended, and we saw increased retention of material taught with clickers for the nonmajors course, but not for the genetics course. We discuss the implications of our results in light of differences in how the two courses were taught and differences between science majors and nonmajors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.