CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 7(1): 45-53 2008
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0064
© 2008 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sheets, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sheets, E. D.

Other Essay

Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes: Meeting Modern Challenges in Undergraduate Summer Research

Peter J. Butler*, Cheng Dong*, Alan J. Snyder{dagger}, A. Daniel Jones{ddagger},§, and Erin D. Sheets{ddagger}

Departments of *Bioengineering and {ddagger}Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; and {dagger}Departments of Surgery and Bioengineering, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033

Monitoring Editor: James Gentile

Address correspondence to: Peter J. Butler (pbutler{at}psu.edu)

Summer undergraduate research programs in science and engineering facilitate research progress for faculty and provide a close-ended research experience for students, which can prepare them for careers in industry, medicine, and academia. However, ensuring these outcomes is a challenge when the students arrive ill-prepared for substantive research or if projects are ill-defined or impractical for a typical 10-wk summer. We describe how the new Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes (BBSI), developed in response to a call for proposals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), provide an impetus for the enhancement of traditional undergraduate research experiences with intense didactic training in particular skills and technologies. Such didactic components provide highly focused and qualified students for summer research with the goal of ensuring increased student satisfaction with research and mentor satisfaction with student productivity. As an example, we focus on our experiences with the Penn State Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology Summer Institute (PSU-BBSI), which trains undergraduates in core technologies in surface characterization, computational modeling, cell biology, and fabrication to prepare them for student-centered research projects in the role of materials in guiding cell biology.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.