|
|
|||||||
Articles |


*Digital Media Center, and
Biology Program, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Monitoring Editor: Marshall Sundberg
Address correspondence to: J. D. Walker (jdwalker{at}umn.edu)
A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Preszler Replacing Lecture with Peer-led Workshops Improves Student Learning CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 182 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 203 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |