CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 7(4): 361-367 2008
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004
© 2008 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, M. D.

Articles

A Delicate Balance: Integrating Active Learning into a Large Lecture Course

J. D. Walker*, Sehoya H. Cotner{dagger}, Paul M. Baepler*, and Mark D. Decker{dagger}

*Digital Media Center, and {dagger}Biology Program, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Monitoring Editor: Marshall Sundberg

Address correspondence to: J. D. Walker (jdwalker{at}umn.edu)

A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
R. W. Preszler
Replacing Lecture with Peer-led Workshops Improves Student Learning
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 182 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cellbioedHome page
P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss
Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 203 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.