CBE-LSE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


CBE Life Sci Educ 7(4): 422-430 2008
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045
© 2008 American Society for Cell Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit Reader Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Reader Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Sign up for eTOCs
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. K.

Articles

The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics

Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347; and Science Education Initiative, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

Monitoring Editor: Diane Ebert-May

Address correspondence to: Michelle K. Smith (michelle.k.smith{at}colorado.edu).

We have designed, developed, and validated a 25-question Genetics Concept Assessment (GCA) to test achievement of nine broad learning goals in majors and nonmajors undergraduate genetics courses. Written in everyday language with minimal jargon, the GCA is intended for use as a pre- and posttest to measure student learning gains. The assessment was reviewed by genetics experts, validated by student interviews, and taken by >600 students at three institutions. Normalized learning gains on the GCA were positively correlated with averaged exam scores, suggesting that the GCA measures understanding of topics relevant to instructors. Statistical analysis of our results shows that differences in the item difficulty and item discrimination index values between different questions on pre- and posttests can be used to distinguish between concepts that are well or poorly learned during a course.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
J. B. Labov, S. R. Singer, M. D. George, H. A. Schweingruber, and M. L. Hilton
Effective Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education Part 1: Examining the Evidence
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 157 - 161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Pfund, S. Miller, K. Brenner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, D. Ebert-May, A. P. Fagen, J. Gentile, S. Gossens, I. M. Khan, et al.
Summer Institute to Improve University Science Teaching
Science, April 24, 2009; 324(5926): 470 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.