|
|
|||||||
From The National Academies |


*Division on Earth and Life Studies,
Board on Life Sciences, and
Center for Education, National Research Council, Washington, DC 20001
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For example, under the radar of public attention, or even that of most biologists, microbiology is undergoing a renaissance. New ways of thinking about microbes and new technologies for studying them are turning one of the oldest branches of biology into an area of unexpected discoveries. A National Research Council (NRC) committee has recently concluded in its report, The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet (NRC, 2007a)1, that the emerging field of metagenomics may well revolutionize research in microbiology; moreover, the new paradigm on which metagenomics is based has the potential to transform how research and theory in many other areas of biology are configured (e.g., Dunning Hotopp et al., 2007; Figure 1). Metagenomics will also lead to a plethora of practical applications, from new medical approaches to alternative sources of energy, as scientists from many disciplines learn to harness the power of microbial communities.
|
This article outlines why the new science of metagenomics is so well suited to serve as a model for such an approach to keeping biology education current. It also serves as a call to the life sciences community to help the NRC and its Board on Life Sciences2 to think about issues, opportunities, and challenges that could be incorporated into some combination of formal studies and convening activities to facilitate the integration of research and education in metagenomics. To further develop the framework for this proposal, we invite interested readers to post responses to the questions that are posed in the final section of this article by clicking on the Reader Comments link.
| RELEVANCE AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS OF METAGENOMICS TO THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it is tied to everything else in the universe.Muir's quote is particularly apt and striking when applied to the microbial world. Existing within, on, and around every living being and in nearly every environment on Earth, microorganisms are by far the most abundant and diverse form of life and serve as the "connective tissue" of the planet. Metagenomics is a potent new tool that vastly expands the ability of scientists to study the myriad capabilities of microbial communities and the as yet unrecognized relationships and interactions of microbes with other forms of life and the environment.John Muir (Muir, 1911)
The Metagenomics Process
A miniscule fraction—most scientists estimate <1%—of the microbial species on Earth can be cultured and studied using classical microbiology and genomics techniques. But by using recently developed metagenomics tools, researchers apply genomic analysis to entire microbial communities at once, bypassing the need to isolate and culture individual species. Metagenomics studies begin by obtaining a sample from a particular environment such as seawater, soil, or the human gut, extracting genetic material from all of the organisms in the sample and then analyzing the DNA in that mixture to gain insights on how members of the community interact, change, and perform complex functions (Figure 2).
|
Applications of Metagenomics
Virtually all biologists, regardless of their field, will find that greater understanding of microbial communities and metagenomics can contribute to their own research. Studying microbial communities through metagenomics can help biologists tackle fundamental scientific questions and address related social, environmental, and economic problems. The following are some of the potential applications of metagenomics:
Advances in the Life Sciences. Deciphering how species within microbial communities function and interact can partially answer fundamental questions about many aspects of microbial, plant, and animal biology and greatly enhance understanding of ecology and evolution. Metagenomics could help address such questions as: What constitutes a genome? What is a species? How diverse is life?
Earth Sciences. Exploring how microbial communities in the soil and in the oceans affect atmospheric balances and environmental conditions can help scientists better understand, predict, and potentially address global changes.
Medicine. Hundreds of drugs available today were derived from chemicals first found in microbes; access to the genomes of additional microbial species holds great promise for discovering thousands more. Studying the human "microbiome"—the trillions of bacteria living within and on the human body—may lead to new ways to diagnose, treat, and prevent disease (e.g., Gill et al., 2006).
Alternative Energy. New sources of energy could be developed by harnessing the power of microbial communities to produce byproducts including hydrogen, methane, butanol, and even electric current.
Environmental Remediation. Understanding the microbes that degrade environmental chemicals can help clean up such pollutants as gasoline leaks, oil spills, sewage, industrial discharges, and nuclear waste.
Biotechnology. Identifying and exploiting the versatile and diverse biosynthetic capabilities of microbial communities may lead to the development of beneficial new industrial, food, and health products.
Agriculture. Gaining a better understanding of the beneficial microbes living in, on, under, and around domestic plants and animals can contribute to improved methods for detecting disease agents in crops, livestock, and food products and can facilitate the development of farming practices that take advantage of the natural alliances among microbes and plants and animals.
Biodefense and Microbial Forensics. Studying the DNA and biochemical fingerprints of microbial communities helps specialists monitor known and potential pathogens, create more effective vaccines and treatments against potential bioterror agents, and reconstruct events in which microbes have played a role.
Value of Metagenomics to Biology Education
Muir's quote also has an important relevance for science education. What separates chemistry, genetics, molecular biology, evolution, ecology, and other disciplines? Where do they intersect, and how do they build from and upon each other?
Metagenomics helps bridge the gap between genetics and ecology, demonstrating that the genes of a single organism are connected to the genes of others and to the entire community. In fact, the processes of metagenomics demonstrate that it is important to study genes and organisms in context and to appreciate the entire diversity of life, even in a single setting. These messages have important relevance across biology and would be valuable additions to any biology class—perhaps especially those at the introductory level.
Because metagenomics draws from and impacts a wide range of fields, it is a valuable tool for teaching themes and concepts that are woven throughout biology education. Indeed, teaching and learning about metagenomics clearly could incorporate the kinds of changes in K–12 and undergraduate science education that numerous reports have called for over the last decade (e.g., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993; Handelsman et al., 2004, 2006; Labov, 2004; NRC, 1996, 1999, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2007b; National Science Foundation, 1996; Rutherford and Ahlgren, 1991).
Some faculty feel that they must use introductory courses to provide students with virtually all the knowledge they will use to understand the basic concepts of a discipline. Some also view introductory courses as a way to help students learn how to interpret news and other information about science so that they can make more informed decisions in the home, at the doctor's office, and in the voting booth. Too often, however, such courses fail to convey the complex beauty of the living world and the innumerable ways that biology impacts "real life." Learning about metagenomics at the introductory level—with an emphasis on its potential real-world applications—could serve to illuminate the basic principles of a wide variety of fields, the connections among them, and the broader relevance of scientific advances to real-world issues. If students can see that there really are interesting unsolved questions that they can play a role in answering, the recruitment of talented young people to science careers may be facilitated. In this way, students will encounter a science that is dynamic rather than static.
| THE BENEFITS OF INTEGRATING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Teaching a new or emerging field is an ideal way to deeply engage students in exploring fundamental questions that are at the heart of scientific pursuit and to encourage them to ask their own questions. Indeed, in the case of the emerging field of metagenomics, the most basic questions may be the most profound. Addressing these questions in turn inspires young minds and active researchers alike, and science benefits.
Others have seen the value of integrating emerging science with education. A number of efforts are currently under way to integrate genomics research and education. For example,
| METAGENOMICS AS A MODEL FOR EDUCATION-RESEARCH INTEGRATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A first step is to raise interest in and awareness of these possibilities among both the biology education and research communities. Frameworks will need to be developed for engaging students in learning about microbial communities and their influences on and interactions with other organisms in different environments and the practical applications of metagenomics. From there, the role of metagenomics in biology education can evolve and expand where necessary in response to the needs of students and researchers.
There is also a need to educate new and practicing K–12 and postsecondary faculty about the science underlying metagenomics, its interdisciplinary implications, and the potential for both students and their instructors to participate in both basic and applied research. Such an effort would benefit from engaging all components of the life sciences community in making decisions about how metagenomics can be integrated with the current system of science education.
| HOW CBE-LSE READERS CAN CONTRIBUTE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 For more information about the Board on Life Sciences, see http://www.nationalacademies.org/bls. ![]()
3 Additional information is available at http://gep.wustl.edu/. ![]()
4 Additional information is available at http://www.hhmi.org/news/hatfull20060609.html. ![]()
5 Monarch Watch is an educational outreach program based at the University of Kansas that engages citizen scientists in large-scale research projects. This program produces real data that relate to a serious conservation issue. Monarch Watch gets children of all ages involved in science. For more information, see http://www.worldwildlife.org/monarchs/publications/bbrfactsheet.pdf. ![]()
6 Founded by the Arno Group, LLC and the University of Vermont's College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, teams of U.S. high school students collaborate with international counterparts to address global climate change. Additional information is available at http://www.globalchallengeaward.org/. ![]()
7 The mission of the Council on Undergraduate Research is to support and promote high-quality undergraduate student-faculty collaborative research and scholarship. Additional information is available at http://cur.org. ![]()
Address correspondence to: Jay B. Labov (jlabov{at}nas.edu)
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bohannon, J. (2007). Ocean study yields a tidal wave of microbial DNA. Science 315, 1486–1487. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/315/5818/1486 accessed 31 August 2007.
Campbell, A. M., Eckdahl, T. T., Fowlks, E., Heyer, L. J., Hoopes, L.L.M., Ledbetter, M. L., and Rosenwald, A. G. (2006). Collaborative programs. Genome Consortium for Active Teaching (GCAT). Science 311, 1103–1104. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/311/5764/1103?ijkey=2150492ecc52bf6784dd7ce340006a495cbd8904&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha accessed 31 August 2007.
Campbell, A. M., Ledbetter, M.L.S., Hoopes, L.L.M., Eckdahl, T. T., Heyer, L. J., Rosenwald, A., Fowlks, E., Tonidandel, S., Bucholtz, B., and Gottfried, G. (2007). Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: Meeting the Goals of BIO2010. Cell Biol. Educ 6, 109–118. http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/6/2/109?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits = 10&RESULTFORMAT = &author1 = campbell&andorexactfulltext = and&searchid = 1&FIRSTINDEX = 0&sortspec = relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT accessed 31 August 2007.[CrossRef]
Csonka, L. N., Connor, K. O., Larimer, F., Richardson, P., Lapidus, A., Ewing, A. D., Goodner, B. W., and Oren, A. (2005). What we can deduce about metabolism in the moderate halophile Chromohalobacter salexigens from its genomic sequence. In: Adaptation to Life at High Salt Concentrations in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, ed. Gunde-Cimerman, N. Oren, A. and Plemenitas, A. Dordrecht: Springer, 267–287, Chapter 18.
Dunning Hotopp, J. C., et al. (2007). Widespread lateral gene transfer from intracellular bacteria to multicellular eukaryotes. Published online 30 August 2007 [DOI: 10.1126/science. 1142490{ (in Science Express Reports). Abstract available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1142490v1?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&HITS=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Dunning+Hotopp&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT accessed 31 August 2007.
Full, R. J. (2007). Remarks from plenary session at the Summer Institute of Science Education for New Civic Engagements and Responsibilities (SENCER). Portland, ME. August 4, 2007. http://sencer.net/Institutes/pdfs/SSI_2007/Presentations/Plenary_Full.pdf accessed 31 August 2007.
Gill, S. R., Pop, M., DeBoy, R. T., Eckburg, P. B., Turnbaugh, P. J., Samuel, B. S., Gordon, J. I., Relman, D. A., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., and Nelson, K. E. (2006). Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312, 1355–1359.
Goodner, B. (2003). Other benefits of genomics. Letter to the editor. ASM News, January issue, http://www.asm.org/microbe/index.asp?bid=11774 accessed 31 August 2007.
Goodner, B. (2001). Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 294, 2323–2328.
Goodner, B. W., Markelz, B. P., Flanagan, M. C., Crowell, C. B., Jr, Racette, J. L., Schilling, B. A., Halfon, L. M., Mellors, J. S., and Grabowski, G. (1999). Combined genetic and physical map of the complex genome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Bacteriol. 181, 5160–5166.
Goodner, B. W., Wheeler, C. A., Hall, P. J., and Slater, S. C. (2003). Massively parallel undergraduates for bacterial genome finishing. ASM News 69, 584–585. http://www.asm.org/microbe/index.asp?bid=23486 accessed 31 August 2007.
Handelsman, J., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science 304, 521–522. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/304/5670/521 accessed 31 August 2007.
Handelsman, J., Miller, S., and Pfund, C. (2006). Scientific Teaching, New York: Freeman.
Hatfull, G. F., et al. (2006). Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform. PLoS Genet. 2(6), e92. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1475703 accessed 31 August 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
Labov, J. B. (2004). From the National Academies: The challenges and opportunities for improving undergraduate science education through introductory courses. Cell Biol. Educ. 3, 212–214. http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/3/4/212 accessed 31 August 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muir, J. (1911). My First Summer in the Sierra, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (1999). Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=6453 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (2002). Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10129 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (2003). Bio 2010, Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10497 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (2005). America's Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11311 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (2007a). The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11902 accessed 31 August 2007.
NRC (2007b). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11625 accessed 31 August 2007.
National Science Foundation (NSF) (1996). Shaping the Future: Strategies for Revitalizing Undergraduate Science Education, Arlington, VA: NSF. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf9873/nsf9873.doc accessed 31 August 2007.
Rutherford, F. J., and Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for All Americans, New York: Oxford University Press. http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Education/?view=usa&ci=9780195067712 accessed 31 August 2007.
Slawson, E. E. (2006). Comparison of dot chromosome sequences from D. melanogaster and D. virilis reveals an enrichment of DNA transposon sequences in heterochromatic domains. Genome Biol. 7, R15.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. B. Labov and N. F. Huddleston Integrating Policy and Decision Making into Undergraduate Science Education CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2008; 7(4): 347 - 352. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |