Multiple-Choice Exams: An Obstacle for Higher-Level Thinking in Introductory Science Classes
Supplemental Material
combinedsupmats1.pdf (9 KB)
combinedsupmats2.pdf (15 KB)
combinedsupmats3.pdf (10 KB)
Address correspondence to: Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall (E-mail Address: [email protected]).
combinedsupmats1.pdf (9 KB)
combinedsupmats2.pdf (15 KB)
combinedsupmats3.pdf (10 KB)
© 2012 K. F. Stanger-Hall. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2012 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).
This work was supported by a University of Georgia System Board of Regents STEM grant, which funded the hiring and training of a graduate student teaching assistant for grading the exams in the MC+SA section. This study was conducted under the guidelines of IRB # 2007-10197. I thank Tom Koballa for advice in the planning phase of this study, Julie Palmer for inspiring the essay exercise, and the UGA Science Education Research Group for feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. This is a publication of the UGA Science Education Research Group.